PRACTICE RBC 1 TEST, PRACTICE RBC 2 TEST, PRACTICE RBC 3 TEST BRANDNEW EXAM WITH 250 QUESTIONS AND CORRECT DETAILED ANSWERS (VERIFIED ANSWERS) [ALREADY GRADED A+]

PRACTICE RBC 1 TEST, PRACTICE RBC 2 TEST,
PRACTICE RBC 3 TEST BRANDNEW EXAM WITH 250
QUESTIONS AND CORRECT DETAILED ANSWERS
(VERIFIED ANSWERS) [ALREADY GRADED A+]
Brian and Ken planned to rob a bank. They decided that Brian would drive
the getaway car, and Ken would run into the bank and steal the money.
They successfully robbed the bank and drove off with the stolen money.
Who would be the principal(s) of this crime? - Both Brian and Ken are
principals to the robbery, and they are equally culpable for the charge of
robbery.
A crowd of gang members attacked a member of a rival gang. The victim
was knocked to the ground and kicked repeatedly in the head with heavy
boots. The victim died from severe head trauma.
Only the gang member that killed the rival gang member is guilty of murder.
True or False - False - Each of the participants in the assault is a principal
2 | P a g e
to murder. It makes no difference which gang member struck the killing
blow since each of them is liable for the natural and foreseeable
consequences of the brutal attack.
Julia accidentally picked up someone else's coat when she quickly left a
meeting. Julia is able to show that she intended to leave with her own very
similar coat. Julia returned the coat.
What crime, if any, occurred? - none - Julia has not committed a crime; she
has made a mistake.
An adult male held to answer for unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor
female presented evidence that he had a good faith, reasonable belief
based on the girl's appearance, actions, and representations that she was
18 years old and a voluntary participant in the act.
Is the male still guilty? - No - there is no criminal intent because the
defendant reasonably believed that the female had reached the age of
consent
3 | P a g e
A sober person driving a vehicle in good mechanical condition was
traveling within the posted speed limit on a dry, clear day. Without warning,
a pedestrian darted out from behind a parked car in the middle of the block
and into the path of the vehicle. The car struck and injured the pedestrian.
what crime, if any, did the driver commit? - None - The injury was
unintentional with no evil design (intent) on the part of the driver
A woman, defending herself against an unprovoked attack, punched her
assailant in the head. The blow caused the assailant to fall onto a sharp
object, resulting in the assailant's death.
The woman committed murder. True or False? - False - The woman did not
have criminal intent,
therefore, did not commit a crime.
Upon approaching a convenience store late at night, Frank was stopped in
the parking lot by a man with a gun. The man gave Frank an unloaded
pistol and ordered him to rob the convenience store. The man tells Frank
that he would be watching him through the window and would "cap him" if
4 | P a g e
he didn't rob the store. Frank robbed the store and gave the gunman the
proceeds.
Frank is not guilty of armed robbery. True or False? - True - Frank has
acted under threat or menace and lacks the criminal intent necessary for
him to be guilty of a crime.
A man went to the home of his estranged wife to discuss a problem they
were having over their property settlement. An argument broke out and the
man slapped his wife and then told her he would come back and "really
beat you up" if she reported the incident to the local law enforcement.
What crime, if any, was committed? - Intimidating Witnesses or Victims -
Felony